You are viewing [info]stoneaxe's journal

Bribery? Really?


So as I have been trying to get myself back in a good writing rhythm (pretty hard when working 12-14 hours a day, seven days a week), I have also been getting caught up on reading.  I found this at SFWA and all I can say is that some people have balls ... giant brass balls ... to go with the lead between their ears.

A reminder:  it is easier to hate people in advance.  It saves time.


So ….

Since I came to the Middle East, I have been very much enjoying my Kindle.  It’s perfect for exercise time, since I don’t have to hold it open.  As I mentioned above, I downloaded The Hunger Games, by Susan Collins, as it was on sale.  I finished this morning in the middle of a four-mile power walk on the treadmill.

Short summary:  set in Panem, a dystopian future America, the story concerns teenager Katniss Everdeen, who volunteers to take her conscripted sister’s place in the Hunger Games, a gladiatorial contest pitting youngsters from around the country in a grisly battle to the death, until only one remains.  Katniss is plunged into the Games, with nothing but her bow-hunting skills and wits to save her.

What did I think?  Well, it was a mixed bag.  On the plus side the characters are believable and varied.  Katniss has a lot of turbulence under the hood and Collins lets the veneer crack at just the right times.  The melodrama never felt overbearing and I think the pace was dead on.  There was little deus ex machine; with only one real exception (a forgivable one in context), the characters mostly thought or fought their way through the plot in plausible ways.  I thought the world-building was thorough and was revealed in manageable chunks for the reader, to let the true nature of the society sink in.  And I can’t deny that it was a quick, pleasant read.  As light entertainment, it appealed.

In the neutral area, I can see the young adult appeal.  The writing style is quick and tumbles loose the way an adolescent thought process might.  It’s written in present tense, which tends to exhaust me reading-wise but after a while, I got used to it.  I don’t think the book gains anything from it, though.  I’ve read any number of “lessons” to be drawn, criticizing religion, godlessness, femininity, feminism, capitalism, and communism, and the Iraq War.  I think you will take away whatever you want.  Dialogue was passable.

On the downside, I saw the major plot twists coming a mile away.  That’s not necessarily bad (I am as much a sucker for cheesy entertainment as everyone) but it did lessen the suspense.  At no time did I think Katniss would die.  Also, the populations of the Districts seemed too small (District 11 is said to have something like 8K pop) to sustain themselves, let along others.  A dozen districts with similar pops and a capital full of useless choads would have had a total pop of 200K or so, which isn’t enough to sustain the industrialized wonder that is the Capital.  I am sure I am overblowing it but those kind of details tend to annoy me.  Finally, while the book has – as someone else put it (forgive me for not citing) – “it’s own cultural baggage,” the idea itself is derivative enough.  It’s been compared to the Japanese book Battle Royale (which I haven’t read) and the Stephen King books The Long Walk and The Running Man, both of which, in my opinion, were a more adult treatment and deeper character explorations.

Overall, I would call it a slightly above average – maybe a “B-,” if I were forced to give it a grade.  I know there are two more books (here and here for those who care).  I'll watch the movie once it makes its way over here.

I’ll probably read the others ... you know, if they come on sale.

Too funny not to share


Okay, this has absolutely nothing to with writing.  Or, maybe it does.  This seems to be one of those stories that couldn't possibly be real and is in fact the work of a really fertile mind.  Having said that, knowing the source, some of my more ... open-minded friends, will probably doubt it's authenticity anyway, just as a matter of course.  Anyway, here it is, with text in yellow and my comments in red.  I laughed the whole way through this.

Snake on a plane forces Aussie pilot to make emergency landing

Published April 04, 2012

DARWIN, AUSTRALIA –  If only Samuel L. Jackson had been on board.  Indeed.  This might have been a story of bad-assery, instead of just funny.

An Australian pilot was forced to deal with his own "Snakes on a Plane" drama after one of the slithering reptiles crawled out of the cockpit dashboard in mid-flight.

Air Frontier pilot Braden Blennerhassett was 20 minutes into a flight from Darwin to the remote community of Peppimenarti in far northern Australia on Tuesday to drop off cargo when the snake suddenly appeared.  Peppimenarti?  Really?  Peppy Menarty?  Sounds like a Jersey Shore girl.  That has to be the most unfortunate name of a town since Fucking, Austria.

If that was not enough, the reptile was chasing a tree frog that had also stowed away underneath the front passenger seat of the small plane, the Northern Territory News reported.  Who the hell does quality control on the security in these planes?  Next time I am on a plane in Australia, I am keeping my feet in my chair and bringing a stun gun.

Blennerhassett made a mayday call and returned safely to Darwin.

"I have heard of crocodiles being loose in planes but not snakes," Air Frontier director Geoffrey Hunt told Australia's national broadcaster, the ABC.  Wait, what?  Crocodiles?  Are you @#$%^& kidding me?

Snake catchers were called in but the reptile has not been found. Hunt said the aircraft remains grounded and he hopes the plane will not have to be pulled apart to find it.  Not found?  How is that possible?  You shut down the engines, start opening panels, and smack whatever is still moving with a shovel.  (This is, incidentally, Mrs. Axe's approach to our sex life.)

"Until we find the snake, it's not good for business," he said. You think?  Their press people must be related to the security people.

Hollywood star Jackson starred in the cult 2006 action thriller "Snakes on a Plane," where he played an FBI agent forced to take on a plane full of poisonous snakes.

Stranger.  Than.  Fiction.

Tags:

Wheels on the bus ... grind to a halt


So ....

Has anyone else ever hit a stagnation point?

Seriously, I am not sure what else to call it.  It's not really writer's block, as I have ideas and ways forward on how to implement them.  It's not really a lack of desire; I look at this stack of stuff I want to finish, for no other reason that I really enjoy writing and want to do it.  It's not even a lack of time.  I've been a job as stressful as the one I am in now (less hours at work then but I have no at home work or chores to do now) and still found time to squeeze in ten or twenty hours of writing in a week.  But right now, no matter what I try to do, I am having a seriously hard time of it.  Even my blog post count and submission rates have really suffered.  And on top of that, what I do write is so pathetic I feel like I have actually regressed.  I re-read my last blog post before this one and did nothing except wince.

So what the hell happened to me?

Well, I can say that for one thing, it feels a bit like exercise.  If you are running five days a week, it's not hard to maintain a certain level of performance.  Stop running for six months, put on twenty pounds, then try to pick up where you left off.  It's hard - too hard, in fact, unless you start slow.  I'm kind of there, as I have not done any real serious writing in almost two months.  So getting started is harder.

Also, I recognize that my free time is coming in more numerous but smaller chunks right now.  Per the exercise example above, unless I am writing all the time, it is hard for me to veer back into that mindset quickly for a short period, unless I am doing it more often.  I have been writing a non-speculative fiction book (a first for me), but it is more journal-style, where the entries are shorter.  Trying to pick back up on Pilgrimage has been tough, even though I have completely re-read the entire thing since I have been here.  I should be painfully aching to continue and instead it's just a minor cramp.

Frustration is certainly a big part of it, too.  It's that self-fulfilling prophecy thing:  you expect to do poorly, then do, prophecy fulfilled, and set the expectations next time even lower.  Ad nauseum.

Is this just a wangst session?  (Wangst is a great portmanteau.)  Am I looking for solutions?  Do I just need to buck up, quit crying and be a man?

(Muse:  Yes.)

I'll get myself sorted out.  Until then, just bear with my scattershot posting and ridiculously low production.  Who knows, I might come out of the other side of this with some great stories.  Or I might come out curled in a fetal position, while my ego says, "You worm.  I'm outta here."  Either way, it should be fun for you casual viewers.


So ....

Man, it's been a month.  A long hiatus.  Now that I am somewhat stable over here in the desert, I have a little time to continue my series, do some other blogging, and in general just get back to writing, as much as I am able to.

In Part I, I talked about getting your planet set-up.  In Part II, we discussed the placement of major land masses.  So now let's talk turkey - or more precisely, water.

Water, that lifeblood of all things (or, at least the living things we know about), has a few magical weather properties.  One is the ability to exist in all three states - solid, liquid, vapor - at the same temperature and pressure .  More importantly, water has an enormous heat capacity compared to earth or air, which will presently become important.  But we'll come back to that in Part IV.  First, let's discuss how our water moves around.  I am going to go on with the assumptions we made about our fantasy world being Earth-like in character.

I linked to the Hadley Cells and how they work.  Because of near-constant heating at the Earth's equator, you almost always have heated air at the equator (scientifically known as the Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone).  When air is heated, it rises.  As air rises, it begins to cool.  Air can only hold so much water vapor at a given temperature, and it is less at colder temperatures.  So if air can hold X water at a temp, it might hold 1/2X at a lower temperature.  The excess water precipitates out, first in the form of clouds, then rain and other phenomena.  That constant rising air over the equator means a near-constant rain over the equator and tropical regions.  This is all a fancy way of explaining why all the world's rainforests are in a thin equatorial band around the planet.

Further north and south, those same Hadley Cells produce a band of high pressure in the sub-tropics, about 20-30 degrees north and south of the equator.  High pressure means the air is subsiding, or settling from above to the Earth.  This is the antithesis of rain, meaning the sub-tropics tend to be very dry - hence the bands of deserts and desert-like environments around the 20-ish N/S of the equator.

Now this is where it gets complicated, because there are exceptions.

The American Southeast, by rights, should be a desert.  It is about the same latitude as the Sahara.  So what gives?  Well, the band of high pressure sits directly over the Gulf of Mexico.  High pressure (the big blue "H" you see on a weather map) rotates clockwise.  So if you imagine a spiral pattern from that "H" over the Gulf, what do you see?  You see air laden with Gulf moisture blowing up over the land, watering it ..,. whereas over the Sahara, a big "H" spinning draws up ... dry air from the south.  You can even see the difference between Georgia and Arizona.  If the high pressure is some degrees south, winds from the southwest wrap moisture into Georgia.  Winds from the southwest of Arizona bring dry air from the Mexican mountains.

These bands are not fixed.  They migrate with the seasons - southward during the northern hemisphere's winter and northward during it's summer.  This accounts for how during the summer, India enjoys the monsoon, receiving tropical levels of moisture during the summer but becoming drier under the high pressure in the winter.

So what do these things mean for your world?  Well, how are your continents placed?  You can expect a band of rain forest across the interior and deserts in the sub-tropics, unless you have some mitigating body of water as a source of moisture.  We haven't even discussed the effects of topography; imagine there was a massive mountain range along the Gulf Coast of the United States.  If there was, much of the southeast US would be very arid.  The mountains would simply squeeze the moisture out, as happens in the Cascades in the Pacific Northwest.  Coastal Washington and Oregon are quite green and lush.  The eastern parts of the state?  Not so much.  This is something to think of when placing deciduous forests and lush green farmland.  Without a steady supply of rain, especially if you are writing about a medieval-ish agrarian society (with primitive irrigation), these things don't exist.  Pine forests are a little different matter.  If you have had millennia of steady patterns of rainfall over some area, you would have the forests of eastern North America, western Europe and southern Brazil.

Remember, nothing about this is supposed to be ironclad, just to get you thinking about how you set your world up.

Next time, we'll tackle that heat capacity of water and how that affects things on a big and small scale, fronts, and some other details that shape your land.

  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories

Wind blows, fire burns ....


Two pennies for the first correct guess for that obscure movie reference.  I reference those two specific elements because earth wasn't mentioned in the quote.  But those are the three here, with a distinct lack of the fourth - or fifth (hintity hint hint).

Regular readers may remember that I am still active duty in the military.  Well, with that comes some requirements, such as uprooting ones self and traveling halfway around the world.  This I have done.  For the forseeable future, I will be the kind guest of the Middle East and as such, will enjoy copious amount of those three elements above.

The ramp-up to this affected both my writing and posting schedules but as things get more stable, I will resume - starting with finishing my "weather world" outline, which should comprise two more entries.

In the meantime, dear readers, stay out of trouble.  I will be endeavor to do the same.

Tags:


Yikes, I got lost somewhere since last time.  I'm overdue for Part II, so here it is.

Previously, I discussed the sun-space parameters that set up the success for the world.  As before, it is usually just simpler to assume an earth-like world:  year-long revolution around the star, 24-hour day, 23.5 degree tilt for the seasons.

As an aside, you are correct:  this does involve a lot of assumptions.  But the world is supposed to flavor and add to your story, not be the driving factor (unless it is).  Assumptions are okay, as long you are internally consistent.  (If you think that's wrong, ask your favorite physicist if they have ever assumed a spherical cow.)

1) Start with the discussion of Hadley cells.  Hadley cells basically postulate a conveyer-belt effect of airflow in the atmosphere:  heating and rising at the equator (the spot of most consistent heating), settling around thirty degrees north and south of the equator, and rising again around sixy degrees north/south.  What this basically means is that you have continual low pressure at the equator – meaning lots of convection (i.e., rain) - and high pressure in the sub-tropics (+/- thirty degrees latitude form the equator).  More on that in a moment.  You can read more on Hadley cells here.

2) We move on to the Corilois force.  Again, you can read up on more of the physics here, but the net effect involves the rotation of the Earth resulting in a right-hand curvature of motion in the atmosphere.  This is the effect that gives us the different prevailing winds at different latitudes.  Between roughly thirty and sixty degrees (on the north side, that encompasses most of North America and Europe), the prevailing winds are westerly - meaning that weather systems move from west to east.

It's worth pausing here to revisit the first entry on the subject.  You can now see how some of those interactions might change.  Say you want your sun to rise in the west.  Spin your world in the opposite direction, the Corilois force moves in the opposite direction and BOOM, the prevailing wind will be the opposite of our world.

Okay, so now that we've done that, what next?  You need to place your major landmasses and determine the geographic features that aren't dependant on weather patterns.  In this case, I would be talking about mountain ranges and dry land versus ocean land.  In the large scale, mountains work independent of rain; plate techtonics drive the formation of mountains and either raise continents or drive them into the drink.  Barring supernatural/magic drivers or cataclysmic events (a la the movie 2012 or the mountain being thrown on the city of Istar in the Dragonlance series ), land mass formation is hyper-slow and once you place them, feel free that throughout your history, the land won't change that much.

Now, you've placed your land masses, determined prevailing winds.  What next?

Currents.

In the absence of land masses, the currents would basically follow the winds.  You don't have to get hyper-anal about this, but just use real-world guidance to come up with something realistic.  (This will become important in part III.)  For example, around North America, the water tracking from the equator up to the northwest enters the warm Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico, flows up the east coast, then across the Atlantic, creating the ... wait for it ... Gulf Stream, the warm water that keeps western Europe somewhat warmer than other locations at that latitude.  Conversely, on the west coast, cold water flows down from northern Pacific, which is why the water off San Francisco is significantly colder than off Virginia Beach, even though they are at approximately the same latitude and receive about the same amount of solar radiation in a year.

(Caveat:  I am not an expert on current dynamics, so like I said, just looking for a common-sense answer.)

Okay, so we have the rock in space, with some parameters set.  Now we've added prevailing winds, land masses, and some water flow.  What's next?

That lifeblood known as water.  What does it do?

That's what we'll discuss next time.

Insert Random Title Here


I stumbled on this while cruising the net:  the Fantasy Novel Title Generator.  Basically, it lets you select a set of number of titles to randomly generate.  I did fifteen and received:

Emerald of Power
Goddess of the Desert Heart
Hirolion's Hunter
Seaِ Curseِ and Dark
Storm and Discord
Sunset and Conquest
Sunset's Conquest
The Aratanor Moon
The Bane and the Citadel
The Island and the Faerie
The Sinash Night
The Southern Magic
The Storm Hunter
Wizard of the Deathless Sun
Zwilion's Keeper

Sadly, about half of those are better that anything I've ever contrived.  #$%^ me.

Here are two more title generators:  one, and then the other.  A couple of fun time-wasters ... and maybe, just maybe, some of the titles will trigger an idea or two.


So ....

As I sit here this moment and watch the tree branches outside settle and groan under the weight of falling snow, I started thinking back on how many fantasy books I've read, and how the weather behaved in such books.  Surprisingly (or not), a lot of it was questionable.  Why is that?  Well, I 'spect most folks don't know the how/why behind how weather works and I figured - being a trained meteorologist and lacking another subject to talk about today - I'd offer some insight.


Muse:  Aren't you a precious peach?  And by 'precious,' I mean 'pretentious,' and by 'peach', I mean jackass.

Thank you, Muse, for that note of encouragement.

Just to preface:  this is just guidance, which is based on the physics and observed phenomena of our real-life environment.  It's not all-encompassing, nor is it absolute.  Tolkein's Middle-Earth, for example, existed as a plane in space before becoming a planet revolving about the sun.  As such, physics as we understand it would not apply.  In the Mistborn trilogy, there are some imposed differences on the physics of that world, which altered weather patterns.  Alien worlds can have any number of explanations and if the writer is in this situation and is having trouble coming up with plausible reasoning for why the world exists the way it does, I think they are better off employing some hand-waved version of, "A Wizard Did It," than some half-assed explanation that will be picked apart by the more discerning readers.

Okay.  I'm going to split this subject into several pieces, starting with the big planetary picture, then focusing down to more finite areas.  Hopefully, it will prove useful in some small way to any readers and I will answer questions as best I can.

All right, enough talk.  Let's make the following assumptions:

- We're dealing with a spherical planet.  If you have a flat earth, or a supernatural space, then this all may not be applicable.
- We're dealing with life-forms as we know them, based on carbon and water.  If your aliens are silica, again, this may not apply.
- There are no world-altering magical effects per above.  Straight, normal world.

If you make these assumptions, you are left with a ball of blue and green, hurling through space.  Pretty, but thus far, no answers on weather.  But back to the ball.  Now before you worry about weather, you have to answer some questions about your world.  This isn't too hard but sketch it down on a sheet of paper and keep it handy; the reference will help a lot.

1) Orbit.  How far is the world from the sun(s), and how fast is it whipping around said sun(s)?  This affects several things.  Astronomers speak of something called the "sweet spot" (In terms of orbital distance) in which liquid water can exist.  This is based on the solar output of the star(s) and the radial distance of the orbit.  But it's worth noting that if you go for the aesthetics of multiple suns, it will affect the orbit, and thus, the seasons.  Here's an an example of orbital tracks around a binary system.  Some of this can be ignored, I think, easier than the weather, as most folks are not up to the effects of binary stars on the orbits and the cascading effects.  As a note, orbital track also affects year length and seasonal cycles.

2) Tilt.  The Earth is tilted on it's axis approximately 23 degrees relative to its orbit.  This tilt is what gives us the seasons (simplified explanation here), and such effects as the varying lengths of the day over the seasons.  If your planet is tilted zero degrees relative to the orbit, every day consists of 12 hours of day and 12 hours of night (or half each of however long your day is).  A tilt of 90 degrees means the world's spin is such that it is flat relative to the orbit, meaning, among other things that over the course of the year, the sun would rise at every point on the compass, not just in the east, and that only the equator would get sunlight every day of the year.

3) Rotation.  How fast does your world spin on its axis?  Earth takes just a hair over 24 hours to complete one spin, hence the day length.  A faster or slower spin has affects wind currents, the daily heating/cooling cycle, cloud formation, and any number of other factors.  The Earth also spins counter-clockwise (as viewed from the north pole); if you flip that, your sun will rise in the west, not the east.  Also, your prevailing winds would reverse direction (which means, in bulk of the United States, big weather features would move from east to west, not vice versa).

This is all very academic and fascinating ... but in the long run, I recommend sticking with an Earth-like setup for your world.  One, it's familiar.  Two, it's a lot less stress on you.  But I offer these items up for consideration because in the event you want things to be different, you need to consider these issues.  You may catch some flack ("Why does this book have the north pole in darkness in the winter?  Why does the sun always rise in the east?") but that will be minor.  Besides, unless these are major plot points in the book, the world-building is the flavor, not the meat of the story.

Next:  Part II, in which we discuss topography, prevailing winds and currents, which drive biome growth and sustainment, and why all those fancy terms are important when you want to discuss why Thrug the Barbarian is getting rained on in the desert.

Stats and Accountability, Part IV


Okay, here's the numbers for Jan 2012.  As I said last night, it was a mixed bag this month; some things went better than others.  Also, I shouldn't complain, as Feb is going to be topsy-turvy like no one's business.

Okay, enough talk.


January 2012 Stats

# of words written:  13321
# words in current book:  14593

# short stories written:  1 (one flash)
# short stories revised:  1
# submissions:  1

# books reviewed:  0
# short stories reviewed: 0

# of blog posts:  7

Latest Month

April 2012
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Best Fiction Markets You've Never Heard Of

Fantasy Market Directories

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow